As we approach the year 2025, the landscape of China's wind energy sector stands at a pivotal crossroads, grappling with unprecedented challenges that test its resilience and adaptabilityInstigated by a series of competitive dynamics and external pressures, the industry finds itself in a precarious position, oscillating between opportunities for expansion and pitfalls lurking in the form of aggressive pricing wars and international setbacks.

On one hand, the specter of fierce price competition has loomed large, with a noticeable respite occurring in 2024. Nonetheless, instances of bids crossing the industry's self-imposed "price red line" continue, keeping the undercurrents of intense competition aliveThe production landscape is marked by a dog-eat-dog mentality where players, driven by market share gains, have resorted to quoting below cost, inflicting deep wounds across the supply chain — a situation that has fostered not only financial losses but also raised concerns about quality standards and overall trust within the sector.

Simultaneously, Chinese wind power manufacturers have embarked on a global expedition, seeking to exploit international markets as openings to navigate the domestic stagnation and work through the complexities of market competitivenessHowever, just as these firms began to explore opportunities abroad, they were met with a powerful "anti-wind" backlash from Europe and the United States, creating highly treacherous waters for expansionThe global backlash has manifested in various forms, ranging from political posturing to impending tariffs and trade restrictions aimed at thwarting the advance of Chinese wind technology and products.

Compounding these challenges, significant investments in grid infrastructure have surged this year, with the State Grid Corporation of China earmarking an additional 220 billion yuan to alleviate grid pressures and enhance wind energy absorption capabilitiesThis influx of investment provides a glimmer of hope for the industry's operational dynamics, aiming to resolve the persistent issue of renewable energy integration

Advertisements

Yet, the short-term difficulties surrounding green energy absorption remain a pressing concern for the entire sector, exacerbated by the complex regulatory frameworks that hinder effective market penetration.

In light of these challenges, the Chinese wind energy sector must answer three pivotal questions that will ultimately shape its trajectory moving forward into 2025. The answers may well hold the keys to the industry's future, framing the narrative around growth, sustainability, and resilience.

The struggle surrounding the "price red line" remains a significant battleground where resilience will be tested continuouslyThe phenomenon of internal competition has permeated the wind energy industry for several years now, culminating in a level of cutthroat pricing that borders on the absurd by the end of 2024. The period spanning 2019 to 2024 saw average prices for onshore wind turbine units plummet from 3,800 yuan per kilowatt to 1,440 yuan per kilowatt, showcasing a staggering decline of over 62%. This plunge resulted in an environment where profit margins for turbine manufacturers fell below 10%, forcing several companies to bid at prices that do not even cover their costsThe ramifications of this price-driven culture have led to widespread losses throughout the wind energy supply chain while instigating serious issues regarding the quality of products being delivered to the market.

The sentiments within the industry have turned grim, with stakeholders bemoaning their circumstances while feeling powerless to change the tideLi Fei, the vice president of Goldwind Technology, expressed poignant observations during an industry forum, stating, “There are no real winners in this price ‘involution.’” In a similar vein, Qin Haiyan, the secretary-general of the Wind Energy Professional Committee of the China Renewable Energy Society, publicly criticized low-price competition as being rife with detrimental consequences, emphasizing that it distorts the fundamental principles of market dynamics and hinders the sustainable development of the sector.

This crescendo of discontent led to the industry finally finding common ground in October 2024, with 12 wind turbine manufacturers signing a self-regulatory agreement that prohibits selling products or services at prices below their cost

Advertisements

Furthermore, in November, a consensus was reached among 40 state-owned enterprises and turbine manufacturers regarding the detrimental impacts of fierce price competition, prompting adjustments in evaluation criteria to prioritize technology over the lowest bidSuch collaborative efforts mark a collective attempt to reaffirm established norms and ensure more sustainable pricing structures.

As a resultant effect, there have been signs of price stabilization for wind turbines beginning in the fourth quarter of 2024, indicating that efforts to combat detrimental competition are bearing fruitHowever, the future sustainability of this nascent trend remains clouded by uncertaintyEven with agreements in place, the reality of rampant “technical losses” still presents itself, with several entities violating the agreed price thresholds multiple timesThe marginal gains from any pricing strategies instituted could still plunge the industry back into another cycle of price wars if the measures to uphold these red lines prove inadequate.

Currently, the development of offshore wind turbines has reached unsettling lows, with bids revealing that a leading candidate recently quoted a price of 2,910 yuan per kilowatt (including the cost of the tower). Once the cost of the tower is set aside, this figures to an offshore wind turbine cost between 2,600 and 2,700 yuan per kilowattSuch competitive pricing begs the question—why would manufacturers continue to underbid? One industry insider candidly noted that developers naturally prefer lower turbine prices, while the 1,200 yuan per kilowatt threshold exists largely as a self-protective measure for manufacturersIndeed, if the framework allows for such underpricing to persist, it raises a legitimate concern regarding the longevity of healthy competition and industry sustainability.

Such intricacies highlight how the enforcement of the "price red line" is riddled with obstaclesWhile it may restrict turbine manufacturers somewhat, it fails to impose the same discipline on state-owned enterprises, leading to lingering uncertainties surrounding operational practices

Advertisements

Moreover, because the self-regulatory agreement lacks legal enforceability, without definitive consequences or punitive measures for noncompliance, it paves the way for further erosion of competitive norms.

Another critical factor exacerbating this problem is the relentless movement towards larger turbines and technological advancementLogically, as the industry rebounds, the costs associated with these larger units are expected to decrease further, making it all the more tempting for manufacturers to breach established price thresholdsThe rolls of innovation continue unabated, and as the 10-megawatt turbine models have rapidly become mainstream, we see the distinct potential for even larger units, heralding a complicated new chapter for the industry.

Despite recent signs of price stabilization, the aforementioned dynamics imply that the push toward increasingly larger turbines will inject volatility into pricing trends, yielding a significant likelihood for further breaches of pre-established pricing normsThus, it appears clear that while the “price red line” has been momentarily stabilized, maintaining it will be an ongoing battle requiring more than just temporary agreementsThe real aim of this endeavor should pivot towards nurturing a healthy competitive environment and shifting from a solely cost-driven rationale to a value-driven approach that benefits all stakeholders involvedTo achieve this, appropriate adjustments to bidding and evaluation criteria must emerge, fostering synergistic relationships between developers and manufacturers.

This red line defense is set to be a long-term struggle, necessitating the formulation of refreshed understandings and coordination among industry players embarking on this journeyAs a collective body, the wind energy sector must embrace newfound principles of collaboration to thrive amidst an evolving marketplaceThe path ahead will undoubtedly be fraught with trials and uncertainties.

The quest for global expansion in the face of domestic price wars is dominantly charted on the horizon for the Chinese wind turbine industry

Facing the internal pressures of shrinking margins due to low prices, seeking out quality international markets is no longer an option—it's a requisite strategy for growth.

During recent remarks, Qin Haiyan articulated the significance of this internationalization at the 2025 Chinese Wind Energy New Year's Tea Party, positing that by 2030, the Asia-Pacific region, aside from China, will primarily rely on Indian markets for wind energy supply chains, with most offshore wind power infrastructures proving inadequate to meet local needs.

However, the moment Chinese firms commenced their global endeavor, they were confronted by fierce political resistance from Europe and the US, heralding a renewed wave of opposition against wind powerThe German political landscape has recently witnessed calls for the dismantling of all wind turbines, while UK politicians have acted to vilify Chinese involvement, propagating narratives that cast doubt on the safety and sustainability of Chinese technologiesFrance and Italy have taken similar stances to stifle wind power projects, cultivating a landscape fraught with uncertainty for Chinese energy firms seeking broader global engagement.

Simultaneously, the imposition of rising trade barriers has posed a substantial obstable, making it increasingly complex for Chinese companies to navigate international waters without facing repercussionsStarting in 2019, several nations, including Mexico, Canada, and Vietnam, initiated anti-dumping investigations into Chinese wind energy products, contributing to a generalized climate of skepticism and hostility towards domestic manufacturers.

In April last year, the EU launched a probe regarding wind turbine suppliers from China operating within their member states, which culminated in December with Vietnam instituting an unprecedented 97% anti-dumping tax on Chinese wind towers and equipment componentsThis series of retaliatory measures threatens to strip the competitive edge from Chinese manufacturers, forcing them into precarious positions as tariffs and local sourcing policies escalate in both intensity and complexity.

The cumulative pressure has dramatically squeezed the export potential of Chinese wind companies, with their overseas orders failing to convert into substantive sales figures

Recent analyses have revealed a stark contrast, indicating that in the year 2024 alone, the foreign signed contracts for wind machine manufacturers tallied around 26 gigawatts, yet actual export capacity only reached 5.5 gigawatts—an astounding gap of five timesMoreover, despite a notable increase in export capacity, it falls well short of the soaring international demand.

In light of these constraining circumstances, Chinese firms must formulate alternative paths for global engagement, prompting the exploration of manufacturing investments abroad in an attempt to reconstruct their supply chainsHowever, the notion that relocating manufacturing operations will duly rectify underlying challenges is suspect at bestThis perspective overlooks the intricate realities of establishing operations in foreign territories, which encompasses compliance with local labor laws, carbon footprint certifications, and varying renewable energy standards, among other critical factors.

These complexities run the risk of imposing significant operational costs that could further curtail the competitive advantages currently possessed by Chinese firmsMoreover, as plans to build overseas factories are put into action, the specter of renewed pricing wars threatens to accelerate the "external deviation" — as foreign rivals increase their prices, the market could burden Chinese manufacturers, thereby compelling them to adopt aggressive pricing strategies that further undermine overall sustainability.

Indeed, between 2023 and 2024, leading European manufacturers like Vestas and Nordex have incrementally ratcheted up the prices of their wind turbinesIn stark contrast, prices for Chinese exported turbines have continued their downward trajectoryStatistical insights from Bloomberg New Energy Finance reveal that by 2023, the price of Chinese turbines exported to international markets was, on average, 20% lower than that of their Western competitorsFurther, in the first half of 2024, this disparity expanded to 28%, eventually peaking at a staggering 32% by the year’s conclusion.

While Chinese products continue to compete on price, the alarming rates of decline necessitate a reevaluation of strategic approaches to ensure the longevity of their export positions

The collateral risks associated with capitalizing on lower pricing must be evaluated scrupulously—strategies must be crafted that address the realities of supply chain dynamics, timely recoupment of revenues and the inherent risks within international trade venues.

As the industry wades through turbulent circumstances, the emphasis must also shift to seizing emerging opportunities while managing the dual-sided nature of profit and risk management—a skillset that will be fundamental for firms navigating through these gusting tides of international competition.

Yet, even as pricing concerns and international endeavors dominate discussions, China’s wind energy sector is forced to confront an essential impediment: the botched integration of renewable energy sources into the national gridThis problem extends far beyond immediate pricing pressures, as regional discrepancies in electricity demand starkly contrast with renewable energy generation capabilities.

It is well-known that the “Three Norths” regions represent approximately 80% of China’s wind energy potential, while 70% of the country’s electricity demand congregates within central and eastern areas, approximately 800 to 3,000 kilometers awayAs a result, while wind turbines in the northwestern deserts spin and solar panels glisten under sunlight, the generated clean energy struggles to find effective pathways for consumption, fostering an epidemic of wasted resources.

In light of rapid expansions in renewable energy installation capacity, various provinces have found themselves grappling with staggering levels of wasteReports from provinces like Liaoning, Jilin, Heilongjiang, Gansu, and Xinjiang reveal a considerable decline in utilization rates, while a prominent five power generation conglomerate disclosed a staggering 30% to 40% wastage levels in certain regions.

Recent communications from energy companies have also pointed to "curtailments" of wind and solar energy generation due to grid inadequacies, affirming that even while there is a robust demand for wind resources, transmission infrastructures cannot scale at the same rate—contributing further to waste and limiting operational viability.

With power generation facilities rapidly built in resource-rich areas but transmission capabilities lagging, the discrepancy between different regions aggravates the challenges of transporting energy sources efficiently

In addition to this logistical lifecycle imbalance, another challenge stems from systemic inefficiencies due to a misalignment in investments between generation sources and grid infrastructure.

In the span of the last four years, China's renewable energy installations have skyrocketed from 530 million kilowatts to 1.41 billion kilowatts, with wind and solar additions nearing 820 million kilowatts—an average of over 200 million kilowatts annuallyThis unprecedented growth, however, has met with a corresponding lack of investment in grid infrastructure, as the allocation of capital sees a staggering imbalance where 66% of investments are heaped onto generation sources while only 34% are reserved for grid advancementsThis discrepancy has inevitably led to significant strains on the grid’s ability to absorb renewable energy at an adequate rate.

As the dawn of 2025 nears, both the State Grid and Southern Power Grid have adopted measures to counteract these shortfalls, with the announcement of an additional 220 billion yuan earmarked for grid investment, forecasting overall spending to exceed 825 billion yuan this year, an alarming correlation with trends observed in power generation investments in recent years.

However, the longevity of these solutions remains in questionThe fundamental mismatch between energy source proliferation and grid capacity cannot be wholesomely addressed through sudden increases in investment aloneAn underlying temporal disconnect exists between the development of renewable energy projects and that of high-voltage transmission engineering, where the former can materialize in a mere 1-2 years, while the latter may require several years to finalize.

This timeline discrepancy illustrates a periodic misalignment that often leaves new renewable projects in a ‘waiting game’ for grid connectivityAs emphasized by a former official from the State Grid during an interview, the urgency of renewable installations often conflicts with the protracted timelines inherent in cross-regional transmission project development.

Moreover, the inherent variability associated with renewable energy generation further complicates this integration journey, amplifying the unpredictability in the established construction timelines

Advertisements

Advertisements